BlogPricingFAQ

Phone: 03-6629-3846 (weekdays 10:00-18:00)

Use caseManufacturingSafety and healthRisk assessment

Using AI to check whether shop-floor work procedures, SDS, and risk assessment sheets meet safety law requirements

Work procedures, SDS, and risk assessment sheets for a press line were checked against Industrial Safety and Health Act Article 28-2, risk assessment procedures, and internal safety standards. AI detected missed hazards and blank risk estimate fields with clause references.

ININDX Editorial TeamProduct Team||8 min read
Factory safety check station with protective equipment, risk assessment forms, and SDS materials

"The work procedure and SDS were ready, but when the labor standards inspection came, the risk estimation field was blank." We reproduced this common safety and health near-miss for manufacturing sites in INDX Compliance using real product screens.

Background

Why work procedure, SDS, and RA sheet inspections miss so much

A safety and health officer at a manufacturer reviews each line twice a year for scheduled inspections and labor standards visits, checkingwork procedures, SDS, and risk assessment sheets. The legal standards include Industrial Safety and Health Act Article 28-2, notices, and internal safety standards, and the documents for one line alone can reach dozens of pages.

The difficult part is that easy-to-miss points are scattered throughout: hazards may be listed while risk levels are blank, or protective gloves may be mentioned without material or standard.missing fields and insufficient specificityare hard to catch by skimming documents, so the process depended heavily on reviewer experience and concentration.

Challenges encountered

  • With more than 10 lines, reviewing work procedures, SDSs, and RA sheets twice a year took more than 100 hours.
  • Missed hazard identification and blank risk estimation fields were easy to overlook manually and sometimes surfaced only during inspections.
  • Reviewers had to look up which article or procedure was implicated each time, which also slowed explanation materials.
  • When reviewers changed roles, the basis for past OK decisions became unclear, making the process person-dependent.
01Trial

Select the documents and target line to inspect

First, there is no complex setup."Check whether the press line work procedure, SDS, and RA sheet satisfy Industrial Safety and Health Act risk assessment obligations."We entered that in the same language a safety officer would use with a manager. AI automatically built the inspection workflow.

app.indx-compliance.com/start/draft

Your instruction (plain language is fine)

"Check whether the press line work procedure, SDS, and risk assessment sheet satisfy Industrial Safety and Health Act risk assessment obligations and internal safety standards. Flag missing hazard identification, PPE, or risk reduction measures with article-number evidence."

AI generated the checklist workflowdraft · 4 steps

Inspection documents (3)

  • press-line_work-procedure_Rev4.pdf

    Work procedure · 18 pages

    Work procedure
  • chemical-a_SDS_v2.pdf

    SDS · 6 pages

    SDS
  • risk-assessment_press_2025Q4.xlsx

    RA sheet · 3 pages

    RA sheet
  1. 01Import target documents

    Import the work procedure, SDS, and risk assessment sheet as inspection targets.

  2. 02Compare against the Industrial Safety and Health Act and risk assessment procedure

    Compare item by item against the Industrial Safety and Health Act, notices, internal safety standards, and risk assessment procedure.

  3. 03Verify evidence and confidence

    Confirm evidence for hazard identification, risk reduction measures, PPE, and training records with article numbers.

  4. 04Final human review

    Route only needs-review and non-compliant items to the safety officer and record approval or correction.

Screen 1From a plain-language instruction, AI generates a 4-step inspection workflow: import target documents -> compare with laws and internal standards -> verify evidence and article numbers -> final human review. Target documents can also be confirmed on this screen.

No programming knowledge or complex rule configuration is required. The generated workflow can be reviewed and edited, then reused for later inspections. When the line changes, replace the documents and run it again.

02Trial

Run it to see decisions for each check with article numbers

After saving and running the workflow, AI checks whether each statement in the work procedure, SDS, and risk assessment sheet satisfies the Industrial Safety and Health Act, risk assessment procedure, and internal safety standards. The key point isEvery decision includes the article number used as evidence, such as Industrial Safety and Health Act Article 28-2 or Internal Safety Standard Article 12, so reviewers can verify the source instead of trusting the AI conclusion blindly.

app.indx-compliance.com/runs/run_anzen-2026-04
Safety and health inspectionPress line2026-04-28

Compared against Industrial Safety and Health Act Article 28-2 / risk assessment procedure / internal safety standards

Safety, Health, and Risk Assessment Inspection

Run on 2026-04-28 | 8 checks (work procedure / SDS / RA sheet)

Evidence and article numbers included

4

Compliant

2

Needs review

2

Non-compliant

Compliant 50%
  • Decision evidence (article number)Industrial Safety and Health Act Article 28-2 p.1

    When conducting an investigation of hazards or harmful factors, the employer must identify all work-related hazards and harmful factors (MHLW Risk Assessment Guidelines Article 4).

    Checked law or standard
    Industrial Safety and Health Act Article 28-2
    Source match
    Possible conflict with standard
    AI confidence
    91%

    The RA sheet does not mention pinch risk during die replacement. Major hazards in press work are not fully identified.

Screen 2A list of 4 compliant / 2 needs review / 2 non-compliant checks. Tap a row to open the highlighted law or internal standard text used as evidence and the reason for the missing or defective entry.

In this test, AI detected a missing RA sheet entry for pinch risk during die replacement, meaning incomplete hazard identification, and a blank risk estimation field for chemical A handling as two issues. Both are typical defects often flagged by inspectors. Even documents reviewed every month showed gaps when checked comprehensively by AI.

03Trial

Humans review only the needs-review and non-compliant checks and finalize corrections

The 4 checks AI marked compliant have article-number evidence attached and can be checked quickly. Human judgment is reserved forthe 2 needs-review checks and 2 non-compliant checks, 4 checks in total. The safety officer issued correction instructions to the line owner, reran the workflow after additions and fixes, and finally approved and locked all checks.

app.indx-compliance.com/runs/run_anzen-2026-04/review

Final review (safety and health officer confirmed)

Non-compliantHazards and harmful factors must be comprehensively identified

The risk assessment sheet does not mention pinch risk during die replacement. Because it does not satisfy Industrial Safety and Health Act Article 28-2 obligations, a correction was requested and the owner was asked to add it and resubmit.

Needs reviewPPE types and standards must be specified

Protective gloves are mentioned, but material and standard, such as JIS T 8116 equivalent, are still being requested.

Humans review only the 4 needs-review and non-compliant checks.The 4 compliant checks can move through with evidence attached, so reviewers can focus on judgment.

Audit log (tamper-proof)

  1. 09:12AI

    Assessed 8 checks (4 compliant / 2 needs review / 2 non-compliant). Detected incomplete hazard identification and missing risk estimation fields

    hash d4c1…7b

  2. 09:45Safety and health officer Tanaka

    Confirmed incomplete hazard identification and missing risk estimation as non-compliant. Issued correction instructions to the line owner

    hash f2a7…c9

  3. 11:20Production line owner Suzuki

    Added pinch risk during die replacement to the RA sheet, entered likelihood and severity, reran AI -> compliant

    hash a8e3…14

  4. 11:22Safety and health officer Tanaka

    Reviewed and approved all 8 checks. Inspection complete (next scheduled inspection: October 2026)

    hash b5f0…3d

Screen 3Left: humans review only checks that need action and can record non-compliance details and correction instructions. Right: every action, from AI decision to correction, recheck, and approval, is automatically preserved in a tamper-proof log.

Every action and decision is recorded in a tamper-proof audit log. Teams can later trace who corrected what, when, and based on which article, and reuse that record for regulator inspections or internal audits. Past and current inspections can also show the improvement history.

Outcome

Result: twice-yearly inspections dropped from a full day per line to two hours

The scheduled inspection that used to take a full day per line was completed from document upload to correction confirmation inabout two hours. Most importantly, missing RA sheet entries that previously passed as probably fine were identified with evidence before enforcement.

1 day -> 2h
Scheduled inspection effort per line

From document upload to correction confirmation

100%
Decisions with article numbers and evidence

Law and internal standard text available immediately

4 / 8
Checks requiring human review

4 compliant checks move through

Key points from this case

  • Configure the inspection with a plain-language instruction. No Industrial Safety and Health Act expertise or programming is required.
  • Every decision includes the original Industrial Safety and Health Act, risk assessment procedure, or internal safety standard text as evidence, so reviewers can verify the AI work.
  • Humans review only needs-review and non-compliant items, allowing them to focus on correction decisions and reduce misses.
  • Actions and decisions remain in a tamper-proof log that can be used directly for inspections and internal audits.
Summary

Work procedures, SDSs, and RA sheets: safety standard checks follow the same pattern

This example focused on a press line, but INDX Compliance works the same way across use cases.Provide the standard documents, such as the Industrial Safety and Health Act, risk assessment procedure, and internal safety standards, along with the documents to check, such as work procedures, SDSs, and RA sheets, and compare them with article-number evidence attached. The same workflow applies to periodic self-inspections of chemical equipment, crane work safety checks, new-equipment risk assessments, and any manufacturing task that requires checking against safety standards.

Try it in your workflow,starting with one document.

Bring a policy, contract, or application document, and we will demo the actual judgment screen. Closed-network and on-premise deployments are supported.

Download the 3-piece product materials set for free

Free download